Vision boards versus process rehearsal: what the research shows

Do vision boards work? There is almost no direct research. The closest studies point one way: picture the steps and the obstacles, then act.

By Kent Shi, founder of MORI62 · Published

The short answer: nobody has properly tested vision boards. A search of PubMed for “vision board” on October 29, 2026 returned no studies. What exists are guides for counselors on using them1 and small case reports. The research on picturing the future is much larger, and it suggests that a board of finished-dream images, used alone, is unlikely to help. Picturing the process, the obstacles and a plan does help, modestly.

What a vision board is

A vision board is a collage of images and words for the life you want: the house, the body, the trip, the partner, the income. You put it where you will see it every day. The idea is that seeing the goal keeps you moving toward it.

What matters is what you do in your head when you look at it.

Picturing the outcome alone

Psychologists Gabriele Oettingen and Doris Mayer followed four groups over weeks to two years: graduates looking for jobs, students with a crush, students before an exam, and patients after hip replacement. People who expected good outcomes did better. People who enjoyed positive fantasies about the outcome put in less effort and did worse.2 Those studies measured fantasies instead of assigning them, so they show a link and not a cause.

Later lab experiments did assign them. Students asked to picture an idealized outcome, such as winning an essay prize, showed less energy, measured by a smaller rise in blood pressure, than students who pictured it in more questioning, negative or neutral ways.3 The samples were small, between 49 and 164 students per study, and the effect was measured in the short term. The authors’ reading: positive fantasies can feel like the goal is already reached, so they do not create the energy to pursue it.

Picturing the process

In a study before a college midterm, students spent a few minutes a day picturing either the good grade or themselves studying. The students who pictured the studying studied more and got better grades, partly because they planned better and felt less anxious.4 A review of that line of research concluded that picturing the process of reaching a goal helped people make progress, and picturing successful completion alone did not.5

Wish, obstacle, plan

The best-tested method is called mental contrasting with implementation intentions. You picture the wish, then the main obstacle inside you or in your life, then make an if-then plan: “If I want to skip the gym after work, I will drive there before I go home.”6

  • An early meta-analysis of 94 tests found that if-then plans helped people reach goals, with a medium-to-large average effect.7
  • An independent meta-analysis of the full method, 21 studies and 15,907 people, found a small-to-medium effect and noted that publication bias may make the true effect smaller.8
  • In a randomized trial with 77 fifth graders, children taught this method improved grades, attendance and conduct more than children taught to think positively.9

One result surprises people. Facing the obstacle sometimes leads you to drop a goal that is unrealistic. That is part of what the method does, and it is useful.

Rehearsing the hard part

Mental rehearsal of a skill, like a free throw or a speech, improves performance a little. A 2020 meta-analysis of 37 studies found a small but real effect.10 In sport, imagery combined with real practice worked better than real practice alone.11 Rehearsal is a supplement to doing the thing.

Turn your vision board into a rehearsal

You do not have to throw the board away. Use it as the first step instead of the last.

  1. Pick one image. Say it is a small house with a porch.
  2. Make it concrete. What would it take? A $20,000 down payment by next fall.
  3. Name the obstacle inside you. You spend on weekends when you feel tired and want a reward.
  4. Make an if-then plan. “If I want to order food on Friday, I will move $40 to savings first and eat what is at home.”
  5. Rehearse the moment. Picture Friday at 7 p.m., tired, phone in hand. Picture moving the money and closing the app.
  6. Do one real step today. Open the savings account. Call the lender. Read the listing.

(The house and the numbers are an invented example.)

The limits of this research

  • Most of these studies used students and lasted weeks, not years.
  • Effects are averages. Some people gain more, some nothing.
  • No study shows that imagining a future makes it happen. Imagination helps when it changes what you do.

Where MORI62 fits

MORI62 is Christian guided audio built on this research. Each morning recording moves from the life you want, to the obstacle, to the next real step, and brings all of it to God in prayer. Each evening is gratitude and surrender. It promises no outcome. The MORI62 method walks through each step. For the faith side, read Christian visualization and imaginative prayer.

Sources

  1. Burton, L., & Lent, J. (2016). The use of vision boards as a therapeutic intervention. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 11(1), 52–65. doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2015.1092901
  2. Oettingen, G., & Mayer, D. (2002). The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(5), 1198–1212. doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1198
  3. Kappes, H. B., & Oettingen, G. (2011). Positive fantasies about idealized futures sap energy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 719–729. doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.003
  4. Pham, L. B., & Taylor, S. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process- versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 250–260. doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002010
  5. Taylor, S. E., Pham, L. B., Rivkin, I. D., & Armor, D. A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation, and coping. American Psychologist, 53(4), 429–439. doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.429
  6. Oettingen, G. (2012). Future thought and behaviour change. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 1–63. doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2011.643698
  7. Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119. doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
  8. Wang, G., Wang, Y., & Gai, X. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effects of mental contrasting with implementation intentions on goal attainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 565202. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202
  9. Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2013). From fantasy to action: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) improves academic performance in children. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 745–753. doi.org/10.1177/1948550613476307
  10. Toth, A. J., McNeill, E., Hayes, K., Moran, A. P., & Campbell, M. J. (2020). Does mental practice still enhance performance? A 24 year follow-up and meta-analytic replication and extension. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 48, 101672. doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101672
  11. Simonsmeier, B. A., Andronie, M., Buecker, S., & Frank, C. (2021). The effects of imagery interventions in sports: A meta-analysis. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14(1), 186–207. doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2020.1780627

Hear three excerpts from the real recordings on the homepage, free and with no sign in.

Hear the recordings